From whom the man happened: facts and speculations

There is no riddle in this world more fascinating andcomplicated than the question of who made the person. Passions about this problem have been boiling for more than one century. Since in the life of our ancestors the central role was played by religion, for a long time the only version was the divine origin of man. In those years, scientists did not dare to publicly protest against this statement, as it was easy to get to the fire for it.

Years went by, the role of the Church in the daily life of peoplegradually decreased. There were new theories, the authors of which tried to explain where the man came from. However, most of the original theories somehow "rotated" around the divine origin of a reasonable person. Scientists assumed that it could come from some ancient ancestors, giants and even people who once lived in mythical Atlantis.

The problem was that none of theauthors could not provide any evidence of their version of the origin of people. In a word, the question of who caused the man remained a mystery for seven seals for many decades.

So it was until Charles Darwin did notmade his famous sailing on the ship "Beagle". During his entire trip, he collected herbariums and a collection of animals and insects that he met on his way. In the end, he began to notice amazing patterns in the appearance and structure of various organisms. It was then that a famous work appeared dedicated to the beaks of the finches that inhabit the Galapagos Islands. Darwin noticed the continuity, which helped to explain to him from whom the man occurred.

The scientist noticed that the appearance of the beak of birdsvaried depending on environmental conditions and nutritional conditions. Darwin suggested that the beak could change as a result of a long-term process, which he called evolution (gradual change). From the very beginning, the theory had a lot of opponents, but only the evolutionary theory could clearly explain who the man was from. The scientist claimed that our ancestors were ... monkeys! However, it was this revolutionary statement that was perceived extremely hostile not only by the supporters of the Church, but also by scientists.

However, over time and developmentpaleontology began to appear more and more evidence in the form of petrified remains. Studying them, many scientists began to be imbued with ideas of Darwinism. Moreover, the works of Lamarck and other naturalists who worked on the creation of the classification of animals fit perfectly into Darwin's theory.

Scientists of that time were perplexed by"Gradualness" of the kingdoms of the animal kingdom, since they did not know where to put the person: by all indications it was like the higher primates, but in those years it could not be attributed to "relatives" of monkeys. The appearance of the Darwinian theory perfectly explained all these ambiguities and saved biologists from the need to take a person into a separate kingdom, as required by creationists.

Thus, the question of what happenedman, no longer stood. The theory of Darwin began to be introduced in schools, and almost all scientists agreed with its main provisions. Of course, like most assumptions, this famous theory has its drawbacks. However, it should be emphasized once again that only Darwin's teaching can explain the origin of the diversity of species that exist on our planet today.