Excommunication from the Church as a method of repression
Excommunication from the church is a traditionalreligious punishment, which is applied in Christianity and applies to people who can by their behavior or expressed beliefs damage the ecclesial authority. Although there is evidence that such measures were applied to apostates and violators in Judaism and pagan religions (for example, among the ancient Celts). At present, it exists in the form of a so-called partial, small excommunication (prohibition) and anathema. The first of them is a temporary measure, and the second is carried out for a period until the guilty party fully repents.
We can say that the meaning of this punishmentrooted in early Christianity. Since the Greek meaning of the word "church" means "assembly", or community of believers, then a person who, having joined this group of people ("ecclesia") and making certain promises, violated them, deprived any communication with them.
In addition, the "communion" in those timeswas associated with a joint thankful meal, which took place in memory of the Last Supper. Therefore, the excommunication from the church was perceived as a prohibition against guilty to communicate with believers to repentance.
However, later the significance of this religiouspunishment has undergone very serious changes, and even became an instrument of repression, including political. First, it was extended to people who had beliefs that were significantly or not very different from those of the majority, and above all of the power group. Such people were called heretics. Then there was such an excommunication from the church as an interdict, practiced mainly in Western Europe, when in a city or village that suffered punishment, they did not baptize, crown or be buried in cemeteries.
Moreover, in the XII-XIII centuries such a seemingly religious punishment became automatically more serious
In the Orthodox Church, this punishment was also often repressive. In particular, the excommunicated person
Similarly, not onlysecular humanists or revolutionary youth, but religious philosophers, and even the legal adviser of Emperor Nicholas II, who called this decision of the Synod "stupidity." On the excommunication of Tolstoy from the Church, the writer himself replied in a letter, where he noted that this document was illegal, not compiled according to the rules, and encouraging other people to do bad things. He also said that he himself did not want to belong to the community, whose teachings he considers false and harmful, hiding the very essence of Christianity.