How does freedom and necessity in human activity manifest themselves?

For each person it is extremely important to feel yourselffree and independent of external circumstances and from other people. However, it is not at all easy to understand whether true freedom exists, or all our actions are conditioned by necessity.

Freedom and necessity. Concepts and categories

Many believe that freedom is an opportunityalways act and act as one wants, follow one's desires and not depend on someone else's opinion. However, such an approach to the definition of freedom in real life would lead to arbitrariness and infringement of the rights of other people. That is why philosophy distinguishes the concept of necessity.

Necessity is some lifecircumstances that restrain freedom and force a person to act according to common sense and accepted in society norms. Necessity sometimes contradicts our desires, nevertheless, thinking about the consequences of our actions, we are forced to limit our freedom. Freedom and the need for human activity are categories of philosophy, the connection between which is the subject of debate among many scientists.

Is there absolute freedom

Full freedom implies the possibility of a personto do absolutely anything he wants, regardless of whether his actions cause harm or inconvenience to somebody. If everyone could act according to their desires, without thinking about the consequences for other people, the world would be in complete chaos. For example, if a person wanted to have the same phone as a colleague, having complete freedom, he could just come up and take it away.

That is why society created certainrules and norms that limit permissiveness. In the modern world, freedom in human activity is regulated, first of all, by law. There are other rules that affect people's behavior, for example, etiquette and subordination. This restriction of freedom of action gives the person confidence that his rights will not be infringed upon by others.

The connection between freedom and necessity

In philosophy, for a long time there have been debates about the relationship between freedom and the need for human activity. Do these concepts contradict each other or, conversely, are inseparable.

Freedom and the need for humanSome scientists consider it as mutually exclusive concepts. From the point of view of adherents of the theory of idealism, freedom can exist only in conditions in which it is unlimited and unlimited. In their opinion, any prohibitions make it impossible for a person to comprehend and evaluate the moral consequences of his actions.

Supporters of mechanical determinism, on the contrary,believe that all events and actions in the life of man are conditioned by external necessity. They completely deny the existence of free will and define necessity as an absolute and objective concept. In their opinion, all actions committed by people do not depend on their desires and are certainly predetermined.

Scientific approach

From the standpoint of a scientific approach, freedom andthe need for human activity is closely interrelated. Freedom is defined as a cognized necessity. A person is not able to influence the objective conditions of his activity, but he can choose the purpose and means of achieving it. Thus, freedom in human activity is an opportunity to make an informed choice. That is, to take this or that decision.

Freedom and the need for humanactivities can not exist without each other. In our life, freedom is manifested as a constant freedom of choice, the necessity is present as objective circumstances in which a person is forced to act.

Freedom of choice in everyday life

Every day a person is given the opportunityto choose. Almost every minute, we make decisions in favor of this or that option: get up early in the morning or take a nap, eat something good for breakfast or drink tea, go to work on foot or get by car. External circumstances in this case, our choice does not affect - a person is guided solely by personal beliefs and preferences.

Freedom is always a relative concept. Depending on the specific conditions, a person may have freedom or lose it. The degree of manifestation is also always different. In some circumstances a person can choose the goals and means of achieving them, in others - freedom consists only in choosing a way to adapt to reality.

Relationship with progress

In ancient times, people had enoughlimited freedom. The need for human activity was not always realized. People depended on nature, the mystery of which could not be understood by the human mind. There was a so-called unrecognized necessity. Man was not free, for a long time he remained a slave, blindly obeying the laws of nature.

As science developed, people found answers to themany questions. Phenomena that used to be divine for man were given a logical explanation. People's actions became meaningful, and cause-and-effect relationships made it possible to realize the need for certain actions. The higher the progress of society, the freer becomes a person in it. In today's world in developed countries, the freedom of the individual is only the rights of others.